Multi-sport caster Erik ‘DoA’ Lonnquist brought up the notion of pay-per-view events in response to Esports Engine CEO Adam Apicella pointing out how esports fans criticized competition relay organized on a meager budget. One of MLG’s original employees used Twitter to discuss the entitlement of esports spectators. He claimed that sometimes, while perusing esports reddits, he comes across players belittling the relay of their preferred video game, which they access for free, without being aware of the cost of maintaining a broadcast.
“Decades of investment are required before this can become the commercial powerhouse it may be, but we want traditional sports instead of being content with production and quality matching income. Once more, while expecting to pay nothing to access the content, Apicella said. Apicella also pondered the reactions of esports players who lament the “aesthetics” of casters or desk sessions if they knew that NBA commentators during games sit at foldable tables near the scoring tables. A seasoned esports broadcaster responded to this by suggesting that people pay to watch events, similar to what MLG did in the past before developer-run leagues and competitions were the norms.
“Paying money for the esports content you watch allows it to continue and get better! It was a good thing when it first occurred, and it might still be now. Being dependent on the marketing resources of gaming companies isn’t working, according to DoA. When they began hosting their esports tournaments, developers were criticized for lowering the standards for esports broadcasts because they decided to make everything “free with zero plans for long-term sustainability.”
When will pay-per-view esports events return?
Since the beginning of competitive gaming, the idea of making esports tournaments pay-per-view has been hinted at or stated to be imminent. While several games, including Overwatch and League of Legends coming Worlds 2023, have experimented with offering viewers alternate perspectives or more influence over the relay in exchange for a fee, they have yet to genuinely try to place their entire broadcast behind a paywall in the last ten years.
Some who responded to DoA claimed that doing so would cause fans to stop watching the sport and generate little money. “We’ve specifically conditioned the esports audience to be spoiled brats when it comes to free content,” said the author. In response to DoA, esports writer Jacob Wolf said, “Now we have to deal with it. ESL FaceIt, the largest independent esports tournament organizer or the creator of the competitive game, typically manages esports events in 2023. Esports event expenditures for developer-run leagues typically originate from their marketing budget for their fun and do not account for the amount of money brought in by those events or competitions.
On the other hand, ESL is owned by the Savvy Games Group, which the Saudi Arabian Public Invest Fund backs, so it no longer has to worry as much about breaking even when it comes to event and production costs. The Saudi-controlled firm purchased ESL for $1.05 billion; in 2022, FaceIt and ESL amalgamated. After its parent business Vindex was acquired by ESL this year, Apicella’s esports production company Esports Engine, which organized events for Call of Duty, among other games and contests, was bought by Savvy.
Comments are closed.